Shroud of turin carbon dating problems
In other words, they’re suggesting the original dating was wrong because the assumption that no extra C-14 had gotten into the shroud was violated by a big earthquake.The point of all this, of course, is that the shroud could have been manufactured around 33 A. Oh, and they also suggest that neutron capture, presumably by the body, would have produced the image, though there’s no scientific reason to think that an image could be produced by such a barrage. The first is Thallos, a historian in Rome who wrote about 50 A.Although there is evidence that some earthquakes can transitorily release substantial amounts of neutrons into the atmosphere, there are three scientific problems with the authors’ hypothesis.1. D., and whose works mention Jesus as well as an earthquake and a solar eclipse that happened during the Crucifixion.This evidence is not credible (there was no solar eclipse then), and Biblical scholars no longer accept Thallos’s quoted words as evidence for the historicity of Jesus.They have now raised a new To be specific, an earthquake occurring after Jesus’s body was wrapped produced a bunch of neutrons by shaking up the rocks.Those neutrons were captured by nitrogen-14 to produce carbon-14, the parent material used in radiometric dating.Although scientists and artists aren’t yet sure how the image was made (it appears to include type AB blood, suggesting, since Mary was a virgin, that God carried either an A or a B blood-group allele (or both)).But what is not in serious dispute is that radiocarbon dating of the linen shroud by three independent labs puts its manufacture at between 1000 AD to 1260 AD.
This, of course, could be tested in laboratory experiments, but the authors didn’t do it.3.(full reference in margins) demonstrates the two ways that religion is actually a pseudoscience.The first is that it relies on empirical claims to buttress its dogma.The second is the Gospel of Matthew, which also mentions an earthquake when Jesus died.Needless to say, this is not independent evidence, and the other Gospels don’t mention such an earthquake. If it had happened, wouldn’t the Gospels have mentioned it?
The alteration of the amount of C14 in the shroud would have to be sufficient to make it look sufficiently pre-modern, but not too young.